Argentina’s Energy Minister is stealing for the Crown
By Eduardo J. Vior
While Royal Dutch Shell PLC has announced ten days ago an
annual drop of its global sales in the first quarter by 83%, its
Argentine subsidiary is filling the pockets of its mother company and
the Dutch crown with the help of Energy Minister José Luis Aranguren.
Since his appointment by President Mauricio Macri at last 10th
December, Mr. Aranguren, Shell Argentina CEO from 2003 to 2015, and
2009-15 with downstream responsibility for the whole of South America,
pursuits a policy which extremely benefits his company, and sows hatred
and resentment.
In order to push its oil production, since 2014 Argentina has
subsidized the barrel price, but it costs today U$S 70, twice as high
as the world market price. In the first quarter of this year
the naphtha price increased by 30 percent, pushing up the inflation to
its present annualized 50 percent rate. As Mr. Aranguren recently has
been asked, if this price isn’t too expensive for many people. His
answer reflected the mentality of many government members: “if people
cannot pay for oil, they are free to don’t charge the tank.”
Three weeks ago Shell won seven of eight bids called by Cammesa (the
mixed state-private company which administrates the electricity market)
for the supply of ships with diesel oil. Each shipment costs U$S 18
million so that the total bill reaches U$S 150 million. Shell Western
has won the bid because it has requested a much cheaper price than its
rivals.
Astonishingly, the Energy Minister still owns U$S 1 million in Shell
equities. This fact violates Argentina’s Public Officer Ethics Act, but
nobody in the Macris government takes issue with this unacceptable
situation.
Argentina’s gas production doesn’t cover its total demand so that the
country must import the resource. Consequently for many years,
Argentina has had a solid agreement with Bolivia, and in the last ten
years, both governments have invested a lot of money in the improvement
of the fluid transportation. While from Bolivia imported gas is used for
electricity generation, in the cold season the government habitually
buys liquid gas shipments mostly from Trinidad-Tobago. Imported oil and
gas are used in the thermal power plants which generate electricity for
the industry and domestic consumption.
Following the price increases Minister Aranguren has been punitively
sued by two legislators of the oppositional Frente para la Victoria
(FpV, Victory Front) who have accused him of benefiting from the gas and
oil price increases because of his “double role as a public official
and as Shell shareholder”.
The claimants complaint also alleges that the Energy Minister has put
Shell in a position of privilege, as he last week has announced that
Bolivia cannot meet its obligations to Argentine, and begin to buy gas
in Chile, a country which doesn’t produce the fluid and imports it from
East Asia. Bolivia’s Energy Minister has immediately refuted his
Argentine colleague and stated that his country is sending agreed normal
quantities. The explanation for this import lays in the fact that the
gas transportation toward Argentine is in charge of British Gas (BG),
bought by Schell in last February. This gas is 128 percent more
expensive than the fluid imported from Bolivia.
Already as of 16th March the legislators had informed the governmental Corruption Office but have not received any answer.
It may be that Jose Luis Aranguren is only acting as a loyal employee
of the Dutch crown. In January, he pressed for the appointment of Queen
Maxima’s younger sister for a senior technical post in the Chief
Cabinet Minister Office for which she wasn’t qualified. Chief Minister
Marcos Peña had, then, to promulgate a special Decree allowing the young
woman (30) to take over this charge. Minister Aranguren is misusing his
position in power to benefit unilaterally Royal Dutch Shell and the
Dutch royal family. He is damaging Argentine’s economy, as well as the
competing companies. Soon or later this corrupt behavior will
necessarily provoke a furious reaction. The crown and the mother company
should act if they want to prevent substantial damage to its capital
and reputation.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
Estimad@s lector@s:
Este es un blog moderado. Sus comentarios serán evaluados antes de la publicación, para evitar spam.
Agradezco su atención.
Eduardo J. Vior